- The SEC has requested a review of Ripple's status as a security and whether sales to individual investors violated securities laws.
- In the previous first trial, a U.S. court imposed a $125 million fine on Ripple but ruled that sales to individual investors did not violate securities laws.
- The SEC claims that Ripple violated securities laws by failing to provide important information to investors.
- The article was summarized using an artificial intelligence-based language model.
- Due to the nature of the technology, key content in the text may be excluded or different from the facts.
Ripple and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are entering the appeals phase.
On the 15th (local time), former U.S. federal prosecutor James K. Filan announced on X (Twitter) that the SEC, which appealed the first trial verdict against Ripple, has submitted its opening brief.
The legal battle between Ripple and the SEC began when the SEC sued Ripple for unregistered securities sales. Last year, on August 1st, a U.S. court ruled that Ripple must pay a $125 million fine. In that ruling, Judge Annalisa Torres issued a summary judgment stating that it is difficult to see Ripple as a security, particularly noting that sales of Ripple tokens to individual investors did not violate securities laws.
Meanwhile, in this appeal brief, the SEC requested a review of Ripple's status as a security and whether sales to individual investors violated securities laws. The SEC argued that "Ripple violated securities laws by failing to provide important information to investors" and claimed that "the court applied incorrect standards."